<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Gurock Software Support Forum - Test Run Test Status; Request for Additional Status or Customization]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://forum.gurock.com/feed/atom/topic/303/"/>
	<updated>2009-11-06T19:08:38Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://forum.gurock.com/topic/303/test-run-test-status-request-for-additional-status-or-customization/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Test Run Test Status; Request for Additional Status or Customization]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.gurock.com/post/946/#p946"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestion. Allowing test status customizations is currently not planned but I can certainly see how this additional test status (and a few others maybe as well) would come in handy. We will think about that (and about supporting customizations) and I added it to our feature request list, thanks!</p><p>Regards,<br />Tobias</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tgurock]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.gurock.com/user/4/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-11-06T19:08:38Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.gurock.com/post/946/#p946</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Test Run Test Status; Request for Additional Status or Customization]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://forum.gurock.com/post/941/#p941"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>We&#039;d like a test status of &quot;Blocked&quot; (rather than or in addition to &quot;Retest&quot;).&nbsp; We are tending to create Test Plans composed of a Run of Suites of Test Cases for a specific Test Milestone which corresponds to a weekly or bi-weekly build schedule.&nbsp; When a test fails that impacts our ability to test subsequent or dependent functionality we&#039;d like to mark those blocked.&nbsp; In reality, we&#039;d seldom &quot;patch&quot; or do an interim build during the test run where &quot;Retest&quot; would tend to get used in our environment.&nbsp; I&#039;d rather just mark the tests &quot;Blocked&quot; without implying either a &quot;Fail&quot; or &quot;Retest&quot;.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dbosart]]></name>
				<uri>http://forum.gurock.com/user/31/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-11-06T00:27:01Z</updated>
			<id>http://forum.gurock.com/post/941/#p941</id>
		</entry>
</feed>

